ViceBlitz rates 1xBet and all 6 connected platforms RED. We do not recommend any platform in the 1x network.

Home / Safety Scores / 1xBet
Sportsbook + Casino 6 Connected Platforms Est. 2007

1xBet Safety Assessment

1xBet, 1xBit, Betwinner, MelBet, 22Bet, Mostbet, Megapari — one network, one RED rating. Illegal UK operation. $74,000+ unpaid. Fake transaction references. Confiscated affiliate funds.

By Marcus Vale, Lead Analyst · Last reviewed: April 2026 · Methodology

Automatic Score Cap Applied

1xBet's raw score across all 7 categories totals 27/100. However, the platform operated illegally in the United Kingdom and has documented cases of providing fake UTR (payment reference) numbers to players. This compound severity — UK-illegal operation + documented fraud (fake UTRs) — triggers a cap of 22/100 under ViceBlitz's methodology. Final score: 22/100 (RED).

Connected Platforms — All Rated RED

The following platforms share infrastructure, operational patterns, and the same RED rating. Safety concerns at the network level affect all connected brands.

1xBit Betwinner MelBet 22Bet Mostbet Megapari

Score Breakdown

These scores are ILLUSTRATIVE — based on vetting data and public complaint records. Final scores require verification against live platform data. Scores may change.

Licensing & Regulatory Status

4/15

Curaçao licence claimed (3/8). Verification disputed — operated illegally in the United Kingdom without UKGC authorisation (0/3). Multiple documented regulatory interventions across jurisdictions (1/4).

Withdrawal Reliability

5/25

$74,000+ in documented unpaid withdrawals (2/10). Fake UTR numbers provided — players receive transaction IDs for payments that never arrive at their bank (0/8). Speed varies dramatically (2/4). No transparent published withdrawal limits (1/3).

T&C Forensics

3/20

Broad confiscation language (0/6). Complex bonus structures with high wagering (1/3). Opaque terms across 6+ connected brands (1/3). Account closure complaints show fund retention (0/4). VPN policy used as confiscation justification (0/2). Minimal responsible gambling tools relative to scale (1/2).

Track Record

6/15

Operating since 2007 — 19 years (5/5). Track record includes illegal UK operation and documented non-payment patterns (1/5). 6+ connected brands with opaque ownership (0/5).

Affiliate Programme Integrity

0/10

AGD status uncertain, historical concerns (0/4). Negative carryover applies (0/2). Admin fee applies (0/2). Pattern of affiliate fund confiscation — $74K+ unpaid (0/2).

Crypto-Specific Factors

5/10

Major cryptos via 1xBit sister brand (2/3). No provably fair games identified (0/3). Limited on-chain verification (1/2). Stablecoin support available (2/2).

User Experience Indicators

4/5

24/7 support across multiple channels (3/3). Responsive mobile site and dedicated app (1/2).

Methodology: ViceBlitz Safety Score — Full Methodology

Key Evidence

Fake Transaction References

One of the most severe findings in our vetting. Documented complaints describe a specific pattern: a player requests a withdrawal, 1xBet marks the withdrawal as "completed" and provides a UTR (Unique Transaction Reference) number as proof of payment.

When the player contacts their bank with the UTR, the bank confirms no matching transaction exists. The funds are neither in the player's bank account nor available in their 1xBet account. Providing fabricated payment references is among the most serious red flags a platform can exhibit — it indicates either systemic fraud or a level of operational dysfunction that is dangerous for player funds.

Illegal UK Operation

1xBet accepted wagers from customers in the United Kingdom without holding a licence from the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC). Under the Gambling Act 2005, providing gambling services to UK consumers without UKGC authorisation is a criminal offence.

This is different from platforms that simply don't serve the UK market. 1xBet actively accepted UK customers while knowing it lacked the required licence. This demonstrates a willingness to operate outside legal frameworks — the most fundamental disqualifier in platform safety assessment.

$74,000+ Unpaid & Affiliate Fund Confiscation

Documented non-payment across player withdrawals totals $74,000+ from multiple independent complaint sources. This exceeds the 3+ verified cases threshold that triggers ViceBlitz's automatic cap for systematic non-payment (max 30/100).

On the affiliate side, 1xPartners has documented cases of confiscating affiliate commission balances. Affiliates who invested time and resources driving traffic to 1xBet platforms had their earned commissions seized.

The Network Effect

The 1xBet network is one of the largest in online gambling. The connected platforms — 1xBit, Betwinner, MelBet, 22Bet, Mostbet, Megapari — share infrastructure, terms, and operational DNA. When a player encounters problems with one brand, moving to another brand in the same network does not reduce risk.

The sheer scale of the 1xBet network creates an illusion of legitimacy. Major sports sponsorships and high search volume suggest credibility. ViceBlitz's assessment looks past brand scale to operational safety — and the data is unambiguous.

ViceBlitz Analysis

1xBet's 19 years track record would normally be a significant positive in our scoring (5/5 in the Track Record category). But longevity combined with documented illegal operation, fake payment references, and affiliate fund confiscation tells a different story — it's a platform that has been operating problematically for a long time, not one that has earned trust over a long time.

The fake UTR issue is particularly severe. Documenting withdrawal issues — delays, KYC escalation, unfair terms — is common across the industry. Providing fabricated proof of payment is a qualitatively different category of concern.

The 6-platform network amplifies the risk. If a user researches 1xBet, finds the red flags, and moves to Betwinner or MelBet thinking they've found a safer alternative — they haven't. The same operator, the same systems, the same risk profile.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is 1xBet safe?

1xBet scores 22/100 on the ViceBlitz Safety Score — rated RED. The platform has documented $74,000+ in unpaid withdrawals, including cases where fake UTR numbers were provided. 1xBet operated illegally in the UK without UKGC authorisation. The network spans 6+ connected platforms — all rated RED.

What are the 6 connected 1xBet platforms?

The 1xBet network includes 1xBit (crypto-focused), Betwinner, MelBet, 22Bet, Mostbet, and Megapari. These platforms share infrastructure, terms, and operational patterns. ViceBlitz rates the entire network RED.

What does "fake UTR" mean?

UTR stands for Unique Transaction Reference. In documented complaints, 1xBet provided players with UTR numbers for withdrawal payments. When players checked with their banks, the banks confirmed no matching transaction existed. The funds never arrived.

Why did 1xBet operate illegally in the UK?

Operating an online gambling platform for UK customers requires a UKGC licence. 1xBet accepted wagers from UK customers without holding one, which is a criminal offence under UK gambling law.

Is 1xBit the same as 1xBet?

1xBit is 1xBet's crypto-focused sister platform. It shares the same operator infrastructure and is part of the same network. ViceBlitz treats all connected platforms as carrying the same RED rating.

Where should I bet instead of 1xBet?

ViceBlitz's highest-rated platforms are BitStarz (93/100, GREEN), Cloudbet (86/100, GREEN), and N1Bet (71/100, AMBER). If you need a sportsbook, Cloudbet offers deep sports markets with a 13-year clean track record.

Affiliate Disclosure: ViceBlitz does NOT earn commission from 1xBet or any platform in the 1x network. This entire network is rated RED and we do not partner with RED-rated platforms. Full Disclosure. Responsible Gambling · 18+